Friday, February 28, 2014

Federal OUI Ticket In Massachusetts Lawyers Field Sobriety Tests

If you have been charged with OUI which took place on a road owned by the Federal government, National Park Service land, place on federally owned property, including military bases or other government-owned lands or roads, such as the GW Parkway and the Pentagon parking lot then you will be prosecuted in a Federal court. 

Under 36 CFR 4.23 Operating under the influence of alcohol or drugs

"(a)  Operating or being in actual physical control of a motor vehicle is prohibited while:
    (1)  Under the influence of alcohol, or a drug, or drugs, or any combination thereof, to a degree that renders the operator incapable of safe operation; or
    (2)  The alcohol concentration in the operator's blood or breath is 0.08 grams or more of alcohol per 100 milliliters of blood or 0.08 grams or more of alcohol per 210 liters of breath. Provided however, that if State law that applies to operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol establishes more restrictive limits of alcohol concentration in the operator's blood or breath, those limits supersede the limits specified in this paragraph."

Below is a sample case of federal DUI in Massachusetts as interpreted by a lawyer in our firm.

Have you been charged with federal DUI in Massachusetts and you are wondering what the penalty is for federal DUI and need a lawyer to defend you?

Are you concerned about the consequences of being charged with federal DUI in Massachusetts and you are wondering what the penalty is for federal DUI?

For a lot of our clients, a charge of federal DUI can result in the loss of their job, their security clearance, etc.
Don’t risk going to court without a lawyer, if you have been charged with a crime of federal DUI in Massachusetts.

Our law firm has the necessary experience to assist you with this matter.  We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case.

Peter v. United States

Facts

Defendant appealed his traffic ticket and criminal conviction in the United States District Court for possession of cocaine with intent to distribute, in violation of 21 U.S.C.S. § 841(a)(1). Defendant had also been arrested for the state crime of operating under the influence (OUI) after he failed field sobriety tests.

If you are facing a federal DUI case in Massachusetts, contact a SRIS Law Group lawyer for help.  You can reach us at 888-437-7747

Holdings:

The Federal Court made the following holding:

  • There are three formulations that come within the core class of testimonial statements. The first includes ex parte in-court testimony or its functional equivalent--that is, material such as affidavits, custodial examinations, prior testimony that the defendant was unable to cross-examine, or similar pretrial statements that declarants would reasonably expect to be used prosecutorially. The second includes extrajudicial statements contained in formalized testimonial materials, such as affidavits, depositions, prior testimony, or confessions. The third encompasses statements that were made under circumstances which would lead an objective witness reasonably to believe that the statement would be available for use at a later trial. A statement is testimonial if a reasonable declarant, similarly situated, would have the capacity to appreciate that the statement is of a sort typically preserved for potential prosecutorial use.
Our law firm has the necessary experience to assist you with this matter.  We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case.

Disclaimer:

These summaries are provided by the SRIS Law Group.  They represent the firm’s unofficial views of the Justices’ opinions.  The original opinions should be consulted for their authoritative content.
Thursday, February 27, 2014

Federal OUI Ticket In Massachusetts Lawyers 36 CFR 4.23

If you have been charged with OUI which took place on a road owned by the Federal government, National Park Service land, place on federally owned property, including military bases or other government-owned lands or roads, such as the GW Parkway and the Pentagon parking lot then you will be prosecuted in a Federal court. 

Under 36 CFR 4.23 Operating under the influence of alcohol or drugs

"(a)  Operating or being in actual physical control of a motor vehicle is prohibited while:
    (1)  Under the influence of alcohol, or a drug, or drugs, or any combination thereof, to a degree that renders the operator incapable of safe operation; or
    (2)  The alcohol concentration in the operator's blood or breath is 0.08 grams or more of alcohol per 100 milliliters of blood or 0.08 grams or more of alcohol per 210 liters of breath. Provided however, that if State law that applies to operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol establishes more restrictive limits of alcohol concentration in the operator's blood or breath, those limits supersede the limits specified in this paragraph."

Below is a sample case of federal DUI in Massachusetts as interpreted by a lawyer in our firm.

Have you been charged with federal DUI in Massachusetts and you are wondering what the penalty is for federal DUI and need a lawyer to defend you?

Are you concerned about the consequences of being charged with federal DUI in Massachusetts and you are wondering what the penalty is for federal DUI?

For a lot of our clients, a charge of federal DUI can result in the loss of their job, their security clearance, etc.
Don’t risk going to court without a lawyer, if you have been charged with a crime of federal DUI in Massachusetts.

Our law firm has the necessary experience to assist you with this matter.  We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case.

Jerome v. United States

Facts:

Defendant appealed a magistrate's judgment in Massachusetts, which imposed a ticket for the charge of operating a motor vehicle while under the influence (OUI) under 36 C.F.R. § 4.23(a)(1).

If you are facing a federal DUI case in Massachusetts, contact a SRIS Law Group lawyer for help.  You can reach us at 888-437-7747

Holdings:

The Federal Court made the following holding:

  • In reviewing a magistrate's conviction, the scope of the appeal is the same as in an appeal to the court of appeals from a judgment entered by a district judge. Fed. R. Crim. P. 58(g)(2)(D). The standard of review from a conviction entered by a magistrate judge is well-settled. Conclusions of law are subject to de novo review, while findings of fact are reviewed only for clear error, just as would be the case were the matter on appeal from a district court bench trial to a court of appeals.
  • The text of 36 C.F.R. § 4.23(a)(1) prohibits not only operation of a motor vehicle while under the influence, but extends to being in actual physical control while under the influence. If being in actual physical control is to mean anything, it must refer to something less than actual operation. The regulation applies whether the vehicle is in motion or not. Under the regulation, the government is not required to prove that defendant was actually operating the vehicle, and the fact that his vehicle was parked does not by itself make the regulation inapplicable.
Our law firm has the necessary experience to assist you with this matter.  We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case.

Disclaimer:

These summaries are provided by the SRIS Law Group.  They represent the firm’s unofficial views of the Justices’ opinions.  The original opinions should be consulted for their authoritative content.
Wednesday, February 26, 2014

Federal OUI Ticket In Massachusetts Lawyers 36 CFR 4.23

If you have been charged with OUI which took place on a road owned by the Federal government, National Park Service land, place on federally owned property, including military bases or other government-owned lands or roads, such as the GW Parkway and the Pentagon parking lot then you will be prosecuted in a Federal court. 

Under 36 CFR 4.23 Operating under the influence of alcohol or drugs

"(a)  Operating or being in actual physical control of a motor vehicle is prohibited while:
    (1)  Under the influence of alcohol, or a drug, or drugs, or any combination thereof, to a degree that renders the operator incapable of safe operation; or
    (2)  The alcohol concentration in the operator's blood or breath is 0.08 grams or more of alcohol per 100 milliliters of blood or 0.08 grams or more of alcohol per 210 liters of breath. Provided however, that if State law that applies to operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol establishes more restrictive limits of alcohol concentration in the operator's blood or breath, those limits supersede the limits specified in this paragraph."

Below is a sample case of federal DUI in Massachusetts as interpreted by a lawyer in our firm.

Have you been charged with federal DUI in Massachusetts and you are wondering what the penalty is for federal DUI and need a lawyer to defend you?

Are you concerned about the consequences of being charged with federal DUI in Massachusetts and you are wondering what the penalty is for federal DUI?

For a lot of our clients, a charge of federal DUI can result in the loss of their job, their security clearance, etc.

Don’t risk going to court without a lawyer, if you have been charged with a crime of federal DUI in Massachusetts.
Our law firm has the necessary experience to assist you with this matter.  We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case.

Albert v. United States

Facts:

Defendant was imposed with traffic ticket for federal reckless driving. Defendant raised issues with his presentence report, to wit: he challenged the criminal history points assigned for his prior convictions for operating under the influence (OUI) in violation of 36 CFR 4.23 and for his conviction for violating a condition of his release, and he challenged the reduction given for his role in the offense, arguing that he was a minimal participant. The court addressed the issues.

If you are facing a federal DUI case in Massachusetts, contact a SRIS Law Group lawyer for help.  You can reach us at 888-437-7747

Holdings:

The Federal Court made the following holding:

  • A court assigns points to a defendant's past conviction(s) to determine his or her criminal history category. U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 4A1.1. Unless the conviction is excluded, the Guidelines count each conviction and assign varying points based on the length of the sentence. U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 4A1.1. Certain sentences for misdemeanor and petty offenses are exempted under U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 4A1.2.
  • Under First Circuit precedent, federal, no state law determines whether an offense runs afoul of U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 4A1.2(c)(2). First, to ascertain the scope of § 4A1.2(c)(2), a court should look to the substance of the underlying state offense in order to determine whether it falls within the proscription. Then, the court looks to the relative danger posed by each. 
Our law firm has the necessary experience to assist you with this matter.  We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case.

Disclaimer:

These summaries are provided by the SRIS Law Group.  They represent the firm’s unofficial views of the Justices’ opinions.  The original opinions should be consulted for their authoritative content.
Tuesday, February 25, 2014

Federal OUI In Massachusetts Lawyers Arrest Probable Cause

If you have been charged with OUI which took place on a road owned by the Federal government, National Park Service land, place on federally owned property, including military bases or other government-owned lands or roads, such as the GW Parkway and the Pentagon parking lot then you will be prosecuted in a Federal court. 

Under 36 CFR 4.23 Operating under the influence of alcohol or drugs

"(a)  Operating or being in actual physical control of a motor vehicle is prohibited while:
    (1)  Under the influence of alcohol, or a drug, or drugs, or any combination thereof, to a degree that renders the operator incapable of safe operation; or
    (2)  The alcohol concentration in the operator's blood or breath is 0.08 grams or more of alcohol per 100 milliliters of blood or 0.08 grams or more of alcohol per 210 liters of breath. Provided however, that if State law that applies to operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol establishes more restrictive limits of alcohol concentration in the operator's blood or breath, those limits supersede the limits specified in this paragraph."

Below is a sample case of federal DUI in Massachusetts as interpreted by a lawyer in our firm.

Have you been charged with federal DUI in Massachusetts and you are wondering what the penalty is for federal DUI and need a lawyer to defend you?

Are you concerned about the consequences of being charged with federal DUI in Massachusetts and you are wondering what the penalty is for federal DUI?

For a lot of our clients, a charge of federal DUI can result in the loss of their job, their security clearance, etc.
Don’t risk going to court without a lawyer, if you have been charged with a crime of federal DUI in Massachusetts.

Our law firm has the necessary experience to assist you with this matter.  We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case.

Kings v. United States

Facts:

Defendant's OUI arrest occurred after an officer saw him wandering drunkenly. Defendant then got into his van and fell asleep at the wheel with a beer can and the key in the ignition. A search of the van incident to arrest produced drugs. Based on the Fourth Amendment, the court upheld the denial of defendant's motion to suppress. There was a reasonable suspicion to think that the crime of OUI had been committed, which resulted in the search. Defendant's theory that reasonable suspicion of OUI could not exist because he was found asleep behind the wheel with the engine not running was rejected. The court also rejected defendant's argument that hearsay was erroneously admitted in violation of his rights under the Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment based on Crawford. Crawford stated that a declarant's testimonial out-of-court statement was inadmissible unless one of three exceptions were met. Defendant challenged the admission of testimony indicating that a non-testifying informant stated that defendant was a drug dealer. Although the statement was testimonial, because defendant did not object and because the jury received a limiting instruction, there was no plain error.

If you are facing a federal DUI case in Massachusetts, contact a SRIS Law Group lawyer for help.  You can reach us at 888-437-7747

Holdings:

The Federal Court made the following holding:

  • Reasonable suspicion, a less demanding standard than probable cause, denotes at least a minimal level of objective justification for a stop. In evaluating whether reasonable suspicion is present, a court looks at the totality of the circumstances to see whether the detaining officer had a particularized and objective basis for suspecting legal wrongdoing. A declarant's testimonial out-of-court statement is not admissible under the Confrontation Clause unless (1) the declarant testifies, or (2) the defendant had a prior opportunity for cross-examination and the declarant is unavailable, (3) the evidence is admitted for purposes other than establishing the truth of the matter asserted.
Our law firm has the necessary experience to assist you with this matter.  We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case.

Disclaimer:

These summaries are provided by the SRIS Law Group.  They represent the firm’s unofficial views of the Justices’ opinions.  The original opinions should be consulted for their authoritative content.
Monday, February 24, 2014

Federal OUI Ticket In Massachusetts Lawyers Breath Test

If you have been charged with OUI which took place on a road owned by the Federal government, National Park Service land, place on federally owned property, including military bases or other government-owned lands or roads, such as the GW Parkway and the Pentagon parking lot then you will be prosecuted in a Federal court. 

Under 36 CFR 4.23 Operating under the influence of alcohol or drugs

"(a)  Operating or being in actual physical control of a motor vehicle is prohibited while:

    (1)  Under the influence of alcohol, or a drug, or drugs, or any combination thereof, to a degree that renders the operator incapable of safe operation; or
    (2)  The alcohol concentration in the operator's blood or breath is 0.08 grams or more of alcohol per 100 milliliters of blood or 0.08 grams or more of alcohol per 210 liters of breath. Provided however, that if State law that applies to operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol establishes more restrictive limits of alcohol concentration in the operator's blood or breath, those limits supersede the limits specified in this paragraph."

Below is a sample case of federal DUI in Massachusetts as interpreted by a lawyer in our firm.

Have you been charged with federal DUI in Massachusetts and you are wondering what the penalty is for federal DUI and need a lawyer to defend you?

Are you concerned about the consequences of being charged with federal DUI in Massachusetts and you are wondering what the penalty is for federal DUI?

For a lot of our clients, a charge of federal DUI can result in the loss of their job, their security clearance, etc.
Don’t risk going to court without a lawyer, if you have been charged with a crime of federal DUI in Massachusetts.

Our law firm has the necessary experience to assist you with this matter.  We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case.

Austin v. United States

Facts:

Defendant was charged in two violation notices with operating a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol (OUI) and refusal to take a breath test in violation of 36 C.F.R. § 4.23(a)(1) and (c)(2). After a nonjury trial, the court found defendant guilty of both charges. Defendant filed a motion for a required finding of not guilty on the charge of refusing the breath test.

If you are facing a federal DUI case in Massachusetts, contact a SRIS Law Group lawyer for help.  You can reach us at 888-437-7747

Holdings:

The Federal Court made the following holding:

  • Under Massachusetts law, there are administrative penalties for a person under the age of twenty-one whose blood alcohol content is.02 or higher.
  • Criminal liability for driving under the influence of alcohol is the same regardless of age in Massachusetts ; the prosecution must prove a blood alcohol content of.08 or higher.
  • Under 36 C.F.R. § 4.23(c)(2), refusal to take a breath test is not an option; refusal to take the test is "prohibited."
Our law firm has the necessary experience to assist you with this matter.  We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case.

Disclaimer:

These summaries are provided by the SRIS Law Group.  They represent the firm’s unofficial views of the Justices’ opinions.  The original opinions should be consulted for their authoritative content.
Friday, February 21, 2014

Federal OUI Ticket In Massachusetts Lawyers Violation 36 CFR 4.23

If you have been charged with OUI which took place on a road owned by the Federal government, National Park Service land, place on federally owned property, including military bases or other government-owned lands or roads, such as the GW Parkway and the Pentagon parking lot then you will be prosecuted in a Federal court. 

Under 36 CFR 4.23 Operating under the influence of alcohol or drugs
"(a)  Operating or being in actual physical control of a motor vehicle is prohibited while:
    (1)  Under the influence of alcohol, or a drug, or drugs, or any combination thereof, to a degree that renders the operator incapable of safe operation; or
    (2)  The alcohol concentration in the operator's blood or breath is 0.08 grams or more of alcohol per 100 milliliters of blood or 0.08 grams or more of alcohol per 210 liters of breath. Provided however, that if State law that applies to operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol establishes more restrictive limits of alcohol concentration in the operator's blood or breath, those limits supersede the limits specified in this paragraph."

Below is a sample case of federal DUI in Massachusetts as interpreted by a lawyer in our firm.

Have you been charged with federal DUI in Massachusetts and you are wondering what the penalty is for federal DUI and need a lawyer to defend you?

Are you concerned about the consequences of being charged with federal DUI in Massachusetts and you are wondering what the penalty is for federal DUI?

For a lot of our clients, a charge of federal DUI can result in the loss of their job, their security clearance, etc.

Don’t risk going to court without a lawyer, if you have been charged with a crime of federal DUI in Massachusetts.

Our law firm has the necessary experience to assist you with this matter.  We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case.

Hiss v. United States

Facts:

A jury convicted defendant of operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol (OUI) in violation of 36 CFR 4.23, a judge found that this was defendant's fourth OUI offense, Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 90, § 24(1)(a)(1). Defendant appealed..

If you are facing a federal DUI case in Massachusetts, contact a SRIS Law Group lawyer for help.  You can reach us at 888-437-7747
Holdings:

The Federal Court made the following holding:

  • Under 36 CFR 4.23 (2) the alcohol concentration in the operator's blood or breath is 0.08 grams or more of alcohol per 100 milliliters of blood or 0.08 grams or more of alcohol per 210 liters of breath...
Our law firm has the necessary experience to assist you with this matter.  We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case.

Disclaimer:

These summaries are provided by the SRIS Law Group.  They represent the firm’s unofficial views of the Justices’ opinions.  The original opinions should be consulted for their authoritative content.
Thursday, February 20, 2014

Federal OUI Ticket In Massachusetts Lawyers Chemical Test

If you have been charged with OUI which took place on a road owned by the Federal government, National Park Service land, place on federally owned property, including military bases or other government-owned lands or roads, such as the GW Parkway and the Pentagon parking lot then you will be prosecuted in a Federal court. 

Under 36 CFR 4.23 Operating under the influence of alcohol or drugs

"(a)  Operating or being in actual physical control of a motor vehicle is prohibited while:

    (1)  Under the influence of alcohol, or a drug, or drugs, or any combination thereof, to a degree that renders the operator incapable of safe operation; or

    (2)  The alcohol concentration in the operator's blood or breath is 0.08 grams or more of alcohol per 100 milliliters of blood or 0.08 grams or more of alcohol per 210 liters of breath. Provided however, that if State law that applies to operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol establishes more restrictive limits of alcohol concentration in the operator's blood or breath, those limits supersede the limits specified in this paragraph."

Below is a sample case of federal DUI in Massachusetts as interpreted by a lawyer in our firm.

Have you been charged with federal DUI in Massachusetts and you are wondering what the penalty is for federal DUI and need a lawyer to defend you?

Are you concerned about the consequences of being charged with federal DUI in Massachusetts and you are wondering what the penalty is for federal DUI?

For a lot of our clients, a charge of federal DUI can result in the loss of their job, their security clearance, etc.

Don’t risk going to court without a lawyer, if you have been charged with a crime of federal DUI in Massachusetts.

Our law firm has the necessary experience to assist you with this matter.  We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case.

Francis v. United States

Facts:

Defendant was charged with operating under the influence (OUI) of alcohol and given a ticket for a violation of 36 C.F.R. § 4.23(a)(1), unsafe operation of a motor vehicle, a violation of 36 C.F.R. § 4.22(b)(1), and refusal to submit to a chemical test, a violation of 36 C.F.R. § 4.23(a)(1). Before the court was defendant's motion to dismiss the complaint or, in the alternative, suppress evidence derived from the stop of defendant's vehicle by a United States park ranger.

If you are facing a federal DUI case in Massachusetts, contact a SRIS Law Group lawyer for help.  You can reach us at 888-437-7747

Holdings:

The Federal Court made the following holding:

  • Under 16 U.S.C.S. § 1a-6(b), a United States park ranger may: (1) make arrests without warrant for any offense against the United States committed in his presence as long as such arrests occur within that system or the person to be arrested is fleeing therefrom to avoid arrest, 16 U.S.C.S. § 1a-6(b)(1); and (2) conduct investigations of offenses against the United States committed in that system, 16 U.S.C.S. § 1a-6(b)(3), without any geographic limit to the investigation.
  • The typical traffic stop resembles, in duration and atmosphere, the kind of brief detention authorized in Terry. Like the reasonable suspicion that criminal activity is afoot in the Terry context, the detection of a traffic violation permits officers to effect a limited seizure of the driver and any passengers consistently with the Fourth Amendment. Several courts analyzing 16 U.S.C.S. § 1a-6(b)(3) have held that there is no reason to believe that Congress intended the park police officers' authority to investigate be construed so narrowly as to exclude Terry stops. 
Our law firm has the necessary experience to assist you with this matter.  We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case.

Disclaimer:

These summaries are provided by the SRIS Law Group.  They represent the firm’s unofficial views of the Justices’ opinions.  The original opinions should be consulted for their authoritative content.
Tuesday, February 18, 2014

Federal OUI Ticket In Massachusetts Lawyers Operating Influence

If you have been charged with OUI which took place on a road owned by the Federal government, National Park Service land, place on federally owned property, including military bases or other government-owned lands or roads, such as the GW Parkway and the Pentagon parking lot then you will be prosecuted in a Federal court. 

Under 36 CFR 4.23 Operating under the influence of alcohol or drugs
"(a)  Operating or being in actual physical control of a motor vehicle is prohibited while:
    (1)  Under the influence of alcohol, or a drug, or drugs, or any combination thereof, to a degree that renders the operator incapable of safe operation; or
    (2)  The alcohol concentration in the operator's blood or breath is 0.08 grams or more of alcohol per 100 milliliters of blood or 0.08 grams or more of alcohol per 210 liters of breath. Provided however, that if State law that applies to operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol establishes more restrictive limits of alcohol concentration in the operator's blood or breath, those limits supersede the limits specified in this paragraph."

Below is a sample case of federal DUI in Massachusetts as interpreted by a lawyer in our firm.
Have you been charged with federal DUI in Massachusetts and you are wondering what the penalty is for federal DUI and need a lawyer to defend you?
Are you concerned about the consequences of being charged with federal DUI in Massachusetts and you are wondering what the penalty is for federal DUI?
For a lot of our clients, a charge of federal DUI can result in the loss of their job, their security clearance, etc.
Don’t risk going to court without a lawyer, if you have been charged with a crime of federal DUI in Massachusetts.
Our law firm has the necessary experience to assist you with this matter.  We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case.

Lawrence v. United States
Facts:
During a bench trial in Massachusetts in a traffic ticket case, the court granted defendant's motion for judgment of acquittal on a charge of operating a motor vehicle in a national park with a BAC in excess of 0.08. The court then entered findings of fact and conclusions of law as they related to a charge pursuant to 36 C.F.R. § 4.23(a)(1) that defendant was incapable of safely operating a motor vehicle because of alcohol consumption.

If you are facing a federal DUI case in Massachusetts, contact a SRIS Law Group lawyer for help.  You can reach us at 888-437-7747

Holdings:
The Federal Court made the following holding:
  • he C.F.R. gives no guidance as to the evidentiary relationship between any given blood alcohol test result and capability to safely operate a motor vehicle, the crucial element of the charge of operating a motor vehicle while incapable of safely operating the same.
  • To establish a violation of 36 C.F.R. § 4.23(a)(1), the government must prove that the defendant was incapable of safely operating a motor vehicle as a result of being under the influence of intoxicating liquor and/or drugs.
Our law firm has the necessary experience to assist you with this matter.  We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case.

Disclaimer:

These summaries are provided by the SRIS Law Group.  They represent the firm’s unofficial views of the Justices’ opinions.  The original opinions should be consulted for their authoritative content.
Powered by Blogger.

Popular Posts

Social Icons

Email Us:

First Name:
Last Name:
Email @:
Phone #: --
Message:

Our Phone #

Massachusetts

Cambridge 888-437-7747
Worcester 888-437-7747

About Mr. Gilmore

Mr. Gilmore earned his law degree at Boston University School of Law, one of the top law schools in the country. He obtained his undergraduate degree at Assumption College with a double major in Political Science and Philosophy. Prior to attending law school, he was a Bodily Injury Claims Adjuster with a large national insurer. Mr. Gilmore’s previous legal experience includes the Cape and Islands District Attorney’s Office and the Committee for Public Counsel Services-Trial Division. More about Gilmore