Friday, February 28, 2014
Federal OUI Ticket In Massachusetts Lawyers Field Sobriety Tests
If you have been
charged with OUI which took place on a road owned by the Federal government,
National Park Service land, place on federally owned property, including
military bases or other government-owned lands or roads, such as the GW Parkway
and the Pentagon parking lot then you will be prosecuted in a Federal
court.
Under 36 CFR 4.23
Operating under the influence of alcohol or drugs
"(a) Operating or being in actual physical control
of a motor vehicle is prohibited while:
(1)
Under the influence of alcohol, or a drug, or drugs, or any combination
thereof, to a degree that renders the operator incapable of safe operation; or
(2)
The alcohol concentration in the operator's blood or breath is 0.08
grams or more of alcohol per 100 milliliters of blood or 0.08 grams or more of
alcohol per 210 liters of breath. Provided however, that if State law that
applies to operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol
establishes more restrictive limits of alcohol concentration in the operator's
blood or breath, those limits supersede the limits specified in this
paragraph."
Below is a sample
case of federal DUI in Massachusetts as interpreted by a lawyer in our firm.
Have you been
charged with federal DUI in Massachusetts and you are wondering what the
penalty is for federal DUI and need a lawyer to defend you?
Are you concerned
about the consequences of being charged with federal DUI in Massachusetts and
you are wondering what the penalty is for federal DUI?
For a lot of our
clients, a charge of federal DUI can result in the loss of their job, their
security clearance, etc.
Don’t risk going
to court without a lawyer, if you have been charged with a crime of federal DUI
in Massachusetts.
Our law firm has
the necessary experience to assist you with this matter. We will do our absolute best to help you get
the best result possible based on the facts of your case.
Peter v. United
States
Facts
Defendant
appealed his traffic ticket and criminal conviction in the United States
District Court for possession of cocaine with intent to distribute, in
violation of 21 U.S.C.S. § 841(a)(1). Defendant had also been arrested for the
state crime of operating under the influence (OUI) after he failed field
sobriety tests.
If you are facing
a federal DUI case in Massachusetts, contact a SRIS Law Group lawyer for
help. You can reach us at 888-437-7747
Holdings:
The Federal Court
made the following holding:
- There are three
formulations that come within the core class of testimonial statements.
The first includes ex parte in-court testimony or its functional
equivalent--that is, material such as affidavits, custodial examinations,
prior testimony that the defendant was unable to cross-examine, or similar
pretrial statements that declarants would reasonably expect to be used
prosecutorially. The second includes extrajudicial statements contained in
formalized testimonial materials, such as affidavits, depositions, prior
testimony, or confessions. The third encompasses statements that were made
under circumstances which would lead an objective witness reasonably to
believe that the statement would be available for use at a later trial. A
statement is testimonial if a reasonable declarant, similarly situated,
would have the capacity to appreciate that the statement is of a sort
typically preserved for potential prosecutorial use.
Our law firm has
the necessary experience to assist you with this matter. We will do our absolute best to help you get
the best result possible based on the facts of your case.
Disclaimer:
Thursday, February 27, 2014
Federal OUI Ticket In Massachusetts Lawyers 36 CFR 4.23
If you have been
charged with OUI which took place on a road owned by the Federal government,
National Park Service land, place on federally owned property, including
military bases or other government-owned lands or roads, such as the GW Parkway
and the Pentagon parking lot then you will be prosecuted in a Federal
court.
Under 36 CFR 4.23
Operating under the influence of alcohol or drugs
"(a) Operating or being in actual physical control
of a motor vehicle is prohibited while:
(1)
Under the influence of alcohol, or a drug, or drugs, or any combination
thereof, to a degree that renders the operator incapable of safe operation; or
(2)
The alcohol concentration in the operator's blood or breath is 0.08
grams or more of alcohol per 100 milliliters of blood or 0.08 grams or more of
alcohol per 210 liters of breath. Provided however, that if State law that
applies to operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol
establishes more restrictive limits of alcohol concentration in the operator's
blood or breath, those limits supersede the limits specified in this
paragraph."
Below is a sample
case of federal DUI in Massachusetts as interpreted by a lawyer in our firm.
Have you been
charged with federal DUI in Massachusetts and you are wondering what the
penalty is for federal DUI and need a lawyer to defend you?
Are you concerned
about the consequences of being charged with federal DUI in Massachusetts and
you are wondering what the penalty is for federal DUI?
For a lot of our
clients, a charge of federal DUI can result in the loss of their job, their
security clearance, etc.
Don’t risk going
to court without a lawyer, if you have been charged with a crime of federal DUI
in Massachusetts.
Our law firm has
the necessary experience to assist you with this matter. We will do our absolute best to help you get
the best result possible based on the facts of your case.
Jerome v. United
States
Facts:
Defendant
appealed a magistrate's judgment in Massachusetts, which imposed a ticket for
the charge of operating a motor vehicle while under the influence (OUI) under
36 C.F.R. § 4.23(a)(1).
If you are facing
a federal DUI case in Massachusetts, contact a SRIS Law Group lawyer for
help. You can reach us at 888-437-7747
Holdings:
The Federal Court
made the following holding:
- In reviewing a
magistrate's conviction, the scope of the appeal is the same as in an
appeal to the court of appeals from a judgment entered by a district
judge. Fed. R. Crim. P. 58(g)(2)(D). The standard of review from a
conviction entered by a magistrate judge is well-settled. Conclusions of
law are subject to de novo review, while findings of fact are reviewed
only for clear error, just as would be the case were the matter on appeal
from a district court bench trial to a court of appeals.
- The text of 36 C.F.R. §
4.23(a)(1) prohibits not only operation of a motor vehicle while under the
influence, but extends to being in actual physical control while under the
influence. If being in actual physical control is to mean anything, it
must refer to something less than actual operation. The regulation applies
whether the vehicle is in motion or not. Under the regulation, the
government is not required to prove that defendant was actually operating
the vehicle, and the fact that his vehicle was parked does not by itself
make the regulation inapplicable.
Our law firm has
the necessary experience to assist you with this matter. We will do our absolute best to help you get
the best result possible based on the facts of your case.
Disclaimer:
Wednesday, February 26, 2014
Federal OUI Ticket In Massachusetts Lawyers 36 CFR 4.23
If you have been
charged with OUI which took place on a road owned by the Federal government,
National Park Service land, place on federally owned property, including
military bases or other government-owned lands or roads, such as the GW Parkway
and the Pentagon parking lot then you will be prosecuted in a Federal
court.
Under 36 CFR 4.23
Operating under the influence of alcohol or drugs
"(a) Operating or being in actual physical control
of a motor vehicle is prohibited while:
(1)
Under the influence of alcohol, or a drug, or drugs, or any combination
thereof, to a degree that renders the operator incapable of safe operation; or
(2)
The alcohol concentration in the operator's blood or breath is 0.08
grams or more of alcohol per 100 milliliters of blood or 0.08 grams or more of
alcohol per 210 liters of breath. Provided however, that if State law that
applies to operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol
establishes more restrictive limits of alcohol concentration in the operator's
blood or breath, those limits supersede the limits specified in this
paragraph."
Below is a sample
case of federal DUI in Massachusetts as interpreted by a lawyer in our firm.
Have you been
charged with federal DUI in Massachusetts and you are wondering what the
penalty is for federal DUI and need a lawyer to defend you?
Are you concerned
about the consequences of being charged with federal DUI in Massachusetts and
you are wondering what the penalty is for federal DUI?
For a lot of our
clients, a charge of federal DUI can result in the loss of their job, their
security clearance, etc.
Don’t risk going
to court without a lawyer, if you have been charged with a crime of federal DUI
in Massachusetts.
Our law firm has
the necessary experience to assist you with this matter. We will do our absolute best to help you get
the best result possible based on the facts of your case.
Albert v. United
States
Facts:
Defendant was imposed
with traffic ticket for federal reckless driving. Defendant raised issues with
his presentence report, to wit: he challenged the criminal history points
assigned for his prior convictions for operating under the influence (OUI) in
violation of 36 CFR 4.23 and for his conviction for violating a condition of
his release, and he challenged the reduction given for his role in the offense,
arguing that he was a minimal participant. The court addressed the issues.
If you are facing
a federal DUI case in Massachusetts, contact a SRIS Law Group lawyer for
help. You can reach us at 888-437-7747
Holdings:
The Federal Court
made the following holding:
- A court assigns points
to a defendant's past conviction(s) to determine his or her criminal
history category. U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 4A1.1. Unless the
conviction is excluded, the Guidelines count each conviction and assign
varying points based on the length of the sentence. U.S. Sentencing
Guidelines Manual § 4A1.1. Certain sentences for misdemeanor and petty
offenses are exempted under U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 4A1.2.
- Under First Circuit
precedent, federal, no state law determines whether an offense runs afoul
of U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 4A1.2(c)(2). First, to ascertain
the scope of § 4A1.2(c)(2), a court should look to the substance of the
underlying state offense in order to determine whether it falls within the
proscription. Then, the court looks to the relative danger posed by each.
Our law firm has
the necessary experience to assist you with this matter. We will do our absolute best to help you get
the best result possible based on the facts of your case.
Disclaimer:
Tuesday, February 25, 2014
Federal OUI In Massachusetts Lawyers Arrest Probable Cause
If you have been
charged with OUI which took place on a road owned by the Federal government,
National Park Service land, place on federally owned property, including military
bases or other government-owned lands or roads, such as the GW Parkway and the
Pentagon parking lot then you will be prosecuted in a Federal court.
Under 36 CFR 4.23
Operating under the influence of alcohol or drugs
"(a) Operating or being in actual physical control
of a motor vehicle is prohibited while:
(1)
Under the influence of alcohol, or a drug, or drugs, or any combination
thereof, to a degree that renders the operator incapable of safe operation; or
(2)
The alcohol concentration in the operator's blood or breath is 0.08
grams or more of alcohol per 100 milliliters of blood or 0.08 grams or more of
alcohol per 210 liters of breath. Provided however, that if State law that
applies to operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol
establishes more restrictive limits of alcohol concentration in the operator's
blood or breath, those limits supersede the limits specified in this
paragraph."
Below is a sample
case of federal DUI in Massachusetts as interpreted by a lawyer in our firm.
Have you been
charged with federal DUI in Massachusetts and you are wondering what the
penalty is for federal DUI and need a lawyer to defend you?
Are you concerned
about the consequences of being charged with federal DUI in Massachusetts and
you are wondering what the penalty is for federal DUI?
For a lot of our
clients, a charge of federal DUI can result in the loss of their job, their
security clearance, etc.
Don’t risk going
to court without a lawyer, if you have been charged with a crime of federal DUI
in Massachusetts.
Our law firm has
the necessary experience to assist you with this matter. We will do our absolute best to help you get
the best result possible based on the facts of your case.
Kings v. United
States
Facts:
Defendant's OUI
arrest occurred after an officer saw him wandering drunkenly. Defendant then
got into his van and fell asleep at the wheel with a beer can and the key in
the ignition. A search of the van incident to arrest produced drugs. Based on
the Fourth Amendment, the court upheld the denial of defendant's motion to
suppress. There was a reasonable suspicion to think that the crime of OUI had
been committed, which resulted in the search. Defendant's theory that
reasonable suspicion of OUI could not exist because he was found asleep behind
the wheel with the engine not running was rejected. The court also rejected
defendant's argument that hearsay was erroneously admitted in violation of his
rights under the Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment based on Crawford.
Crawford stated that a declarant's testimonial out-of-court statement was
inadmissible unless one of three exceptions were met. Defendant challenged the
admission of testimony indicating that a non-testifying informant stated that
defendant was a drug dealer. Although the statement was testimonial, because
defendant did not object and because the jury received a limiting instruction,
there was no plain error.
If you are facing
a federal DUI case in Massachusetts, contact a SRIS Law Group lawyer for help. You can reach us at 888-437-7747
Holdings:
The Federal Court
made the following holding:
- Reasonable suspicion, a
less demanding standard than probable cause, denotes at least a minimal
level of objective justification for a stop. In evaluating whether
reasonable suspicion is present, a court looks at the totality of the
circumstances to see whether the detaining officer had a particularized
and objective basis for suspecting legal wrongdoing. A declarant's
testimonial out-of-court statement is not admissible under the
Confrontation Clause unless (1) the declarant testifies, or (2) the
defendant had a prior opportunity for cross-examination and the declarant
is unavailable, (3) the evidence is admitted for purposes other than
establishing the truth of the matter asserted.
Our law firm has
the necessary experience to assist you with this matter. We will do our absolute best to help you get
the best result possible based on the facts of your case.
Disclaimer:
Monday, February 24, 2014
Federal OUI Ticket In Massachusetts Lawyers Breath Test
If you have been
charged with OUI which took place on a road owned by the Federal government,
National Park Service land, place on federally owned property, including
military bases or other government-owned lands or roads, such as the GW Parkway
and the Pentagon parking lot then you will be prosecuted in a Federal
court.
Under 36 CFR 4.23
Operating under the influence of alcohol or drugs
"(a) Operating or being in actual physical control
of a motor vehicle is prohibited while:
(1)
Under the influence of alcohol, or a drug, or drugs, or any combination
thereof, to a degree that renders the operator incapable of safe operation; or
(2)
The alcohol concentration in the operator's blood or breath is 0.08
grams or more of alcohol per 100 milliliters of blood or 0.08 grams or more of
alcohol per 210 liters of breath. Provided however, that if State law that
applies to operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol
establishes more restrictive limits of alcohol concentration in the operator's
blood or breath, those limits supersede the limits specified in this
paragraph."
Below is a sample
case of federal DUI in Massachusetts as interpreted by a lawyer in our firm.
Have you been
charged with federal DUI in Massachusetts and you are wondering what the
penalty is for federal DUI and need a lawyer to defend you?
Are you concerned
about the consequences of being charged with federal DUI in Massachusetts and
you are wondering what the penalty is for federal DUI?
For a lot of our
clients, a charge of federal DUI can result in the loss of their job, their
security clearance, etc.
Don’t risk going
to court without a lawyer, if you have been charged with a crime of federal DUI
in Massachusetts.
Our law firm has
the necessary experience to assist you with this matter. We will do our absolute best to help you get
the best result possible based on the facts of your case.
Austin v. United
States
Facts:
Defendant was
charged in two violation notices with operating a motor vehicle under the
influence of alcohol (OUI) and refusal to take a breath test in violation of 36
C.F.R. § 4.23(a)(1) and (c)(2). After a nonjury trial, the court found
defendant guilty of both charges. Defendant filed a motion for a required
finding of not guilty on the charge of refusing the breath test.
If you are facing
a federal DUI case in Massachusetts, contact a SRIS Law Group lawyer for
help. You can reach us at 888-437-7747
Holdings:
The Federal Court
made the following holding:
- Under Massachusetts law,
there are administrative penalties for a person under the age of
twenty-one whose blood alcohol content is.02 or higher.
- Criminal liability for
driving under the influence of alcohol is the same regardless of age in
Massachusetts ; the prosecution must prove a blood alcohol content of.08
or higher.
- Under 36 C.F.R. §
4.23(c)(2), refusal to take a breath test is not an option; refusal to
take the test is "prohibited."
Our law firm has
the necessary experience to assist you with this matter. We will do our absolute best to help you get
the best result possible based on the facts of your case.
Disclaimer:
Friday, February 21, 2014
Federal OUI Ticket In Massachusetts Lawyers Violation 36 CFR 4.23
If you have been
charged with OUI which took place on a road owned by the Federal government,
National Park Service land, place on federally owned property, including
military bases or other government-owned lands or roads, such as the GW Parkway
and the Pentagon parking lot then you will be prosecuted in a Federal
court.
Under 36 CFR 4.23
Operating under the influence of alcohol or drugs
"(a) Operating or being in actual physical control
of a motor vehicle is prohibited while:
(1)
Under the influence of alcohol, or a drug, or drugs, or any combination
thereof, to a degree that renders the operator incapable of safe operation; or
(2)
The alcohol concentration in the operator's blood or breath is 0.08
grams or more of alcohol per 100 milliliters of blood or 0.08 grams or more of
alcohol per 210 liters of breath. Provided however, that if State law that
applies to operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol
establishes more restrictive limits of alcohol concentration in the operator's
blood or breath, those limits supersede the limits specified in this
paragraph."
Below is a sample
case of federal DUI in Massachusetts as interpreted by a lawyer in our firm.
Have you been
charged with federal DUI in Massachusetts and you are wondering what the
penalty is for federal DUI and need a lawyer to defend you?
Are you concerned
about the consequences of being charged with federal DUI in Massachusetts and
you are wondering what the penalty is for federal DUI?
For a lot of our
clients, a charge of federal DUI can result in the loss of their job, their
security clearance, etc.
Don’t risk going
to court without a lawyer, if you have been charged with a crime of federal DUI
in Massachusetts.
Our law firm has
the necessary experience to assist you with this matter. We will do our absolute best to help you get
the best result possible based on the facts of your case.
Hiss v. United States
Facts:
A jury convicted
defendant of operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol
(OUI) in violation of 36 CFR 4.23, a judge found that this was defendant's
fourth OUI offense, Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 90, § 24(1)(a)(1). Defendant appealed..
If you are facing
a federal DUI case in Massachusetts, contact a SRIS Law Group lawyer for
help. You can reach us at 888-437-7747
Holdings:
The Federal Court
made the following holding:
- Under 36 CFR 4.23 (2) the
alcohol concentration in the operator's blood or breath is 0.08 grams or
more of alcohol per 100 milliliters of blood or 0.08 grams or more of
alcohol per 210 liters of breath...
Our law firm has
the necessary experience to assist you with this matter. We will do our absolute best to help you get
the best result possible based on the facts of your case.
Disclaimer:
Thursday, February 20, 2014
Federal OUI Ticket In Massachusetts Lawyers Chemical Test
If you have been
charged with OUI which took place on a road owned by the Federal government,
National Park Service land, place on federally owned property, including
military bases or other government-owned lands or roads, such as the GW Parkway
and the Pentagon parking lot then you will be prosecuted in a Federal
court.
Under 36 CFR 4.23
Operating under the influence of alcohol or drugs
"(a) Operating or being in actual physical control
of a motor vehicle is prohibited while:
(1)
Under the influence of alcohol, or a drug, or drugs, or any combination
thereof, to a degree that renders the operator incapable of safe operation; or
(2)
The alcohol concentration in the operator's blood or breath is 0.08
grams or more of alcohol per 100 milliliters of blood or 0.08 grams or more of
alcohol per 210 liters of breath. Provided however, that if State law that
applies to operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol
establishes more restrictive limits of alcohol concentration in the operator's
blood or breath, those limits supersede the limits specified in this
paragraph."
Below is a sample
case of federal DUI in Massachusetts as interpreted by a lawyer in our firm.
Have you been
charged with federal DUI in Massachusetts and you are wondering what the
penalty is for federal DUI and need a lawyer to defend you?
Are you concerned
about the consequences of being charged with federal DUI in Massachusetts and
you are wondering what the penalty is for federal DUI?
For a lot of our
clients, a charge of federal DUI can result in the loss of their job, their
security clearance, etc.
Don’t risk going
to court without a lawyer, if you have been charged with a crime of federal DUI
in Massachusetts.
Our law firm has
the necessary experience to assist you with this matter. We will do our absolute best to help you get
the best result possible based on the facts of your case.
Francis v. United
States
Facts:
Defendant was
charged with operating under the influence (OUI) of alcohol and given a ticket
for a violation of 36 C.F.R. § 4.23(a)(1), unsafe operation of a motor vehicle,
a violation of 36 C.F.R. § 4.22(b)(1), and refusal to submit to a chemical
test, a violation of 36 C.F.R. § 4.23(a)(1). Before the court was defendant's
motion to dismiss the complaint or, in the alternative, suppress evidence
derived from the stop of defendant's vehicle by a United States park ranger.
If you are facing
a federal DUI case in Massachusetts, contact a SRIS Law Group lawyer for
help. You can reach us at 888-437-7747
Holdings:
The Federal Court
made the following holding:
- Under 16 U.S.C.S. §
1a-6(b), a United States park ranger may: (1) make arrests without warrant
for any offense against the United States committed in his presence as
long as such arrests occur within that system or the person to be arrested
is fleeing therefrom to avoid arrest, 16 U.S.C.S. § 1a-6(b)(1); and (2)
conduct investigations of offenses against the United States committed in
that system, 16 U.S.C.S. § 1a-6(b)(3), without any geographic limit to the
investigation.
- The typical traffic stop
resembles, in duration and atmosphere, the kind of brief detention
authorized in Terry. Like the reasonable suspicion that criminal activity
is afoot in the Terry context, the detection of a traffic violation
permits officers to effect a limited seizure of the driver and any
passengers consistently with the Fourth Amendment. Several courts
analyzing 16 U.S.C.S. § 1a-6(b)(3) have held that there is no reason to
believe that Congress intended the park police officers' authority to
investigate be construed so narrowly as to exclude Terry stops.
Our law firm has
the necessary experience to assist you with this matter. We will do our absolute best to help you get
the best result possible based on the facts of your case.
Disclaimer:
These summaries are
provided by the SRIS Law Group. They
represent the firm’s unofficial views of the Justices’ opinions. The original opinions should be consulted for
their authoritative content.
Tuesday, February 18, 2014
Federal OUI Ticket In Massachusetts Lawyers Operating Influence
If you have been
charged with OUI which took place on a road owned by the Federal government,
National Park Service land, place on federally owned property, including
military bases or other government-owned lands or roads, such as the GW Parkway
and the Pentagon parking lot then you will be prosecuted in a Federal
court.
Under 36 CFR 4.23
Operating under the influence of alcohol or drugs
"(a) Operating or being in actual physical control
of a motor vehicle is prohibited while:
(1)
Under the influence of alcohol, or a drug, or drugs, or any combination
thereof, to a degree that renders the operator incapable of safe operation; or
(2)
The alcohol concentration in the operator's blood or breath is 0.08
grams or more of alcohol per 100 milliliters of blood or 0.08 grams or more of
alcohol per 210 liters of breath. Provided however, that if State law that
applies to operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol
establishes more restrictive limits of alcohol concentration in the operator's
blood or breath, those limits supersede the limits specified in this
paragraph."
Below is a sample
case of federal DUI in Massachusetts as interpreted by a lawyer in our firm.
Have you been
charged with federal DUI in Massachusetts and you are wondering what the
penalty is for federal DUI and need a lawyer to defend you?
Are you concerned
about the consequences of being charged with federal DUI in Massachusetts and
you are wondering what the penalty is for federal DUI?
For a lot of our
clients, a charge of federal DUI can result in the loss of their job, their
security clearance, etc.
Don’t risk going
to court without a lawyer, if you have been charged with a crime of federal DUI
in Massachusetts.
Our law firm has
the necessary experience to assist you with this matter. We will do our absolute best to help you get
the best result possible based on the facts of your case.
Lawrence v.
United States
Facts:
During a bench
trial in Massachusetts in a traffic ticket case, the court granted defendant's
motion for judgment of acquittal on a charge of operating a motor vehicle in a
national park with a BAC in excess of 0.08. The court then entered findings of
fact and conclusions of law as they related to a charge pursuant to 36 C.F.R. §
4.23(a)(1) that defendant was incapable of safely operating a motor vehicle
because of alcohol consumption.
If you are facing
a federal DUI case in Massachusetts, contact a SRIS Law Group lawyer for
help. You can reach us at 888-437-7747
Holdings:
The Federal Court
made the following holding:
- he C.F.R. gives no
guidance as to the evidentiary relationship between any given blood
alcohol test result and capability to safely operate a motor vehicle, the
crucial element of the charge of operating a motor vehicle while incapable
of safely operating the same.
- To establish a violation
of 36 C.F.R. § 4.23(a)(1), the government must prove that the defendant
was incapable of safely operating a motor vehicle as a result of being
under the influence of intoxicating liquor and/or drugs.
Our law firm has
the necessary experience to assist you with this matter. We will do our absolute best to help you get
the best result possible based on the facts of your case.
Disclaimer:
These summaries are
provided by the SRIS Law Group. They
represent the firm’s unofficial views of the Justices’ opinions. The original opinions should be consulted for
their authoritative content.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Blog Archive
-
2014
(58)
- October(7)
- September(2)
- August(4)
- April(22)
- March(15)
-
February(8)
- Federal OUI Ticket In Massachusetts Lawyers Field ...
- Federal OUI Ticket In Massachusetts Lawyers 36 CFR...
- Federal OUI Ticket In Massachusetts Lawyers 36 CFR...
- Federal OUI In Massachusetts Lawyers Arrest Probab...
- Federal OUI Ticket In Massachusetts Lawyers Breath...
- Federal OUI Ticket In Massachusetts Lawyers Violat...
- Federal OUI Ticket In Massachusetts Lawyers Chemic...
- Federal OUI Ticket In Massachusetts Lawyers Operat...
Powered by Blogger.
Popular Posts
-
If you have been charged with OUI which took place on a road owned by the Federal government, National Park Service land, place on federall...
-
If you have been charged with OUI which took place on a road owned by the Federal government, National Park Service land, place on federall...
-
If you have been charged with OUI which took place on a road owned by the Federal government, National Park Service land, place on federall...
-
If you have been charged with OUI which took place on a road owned by the Federal government, National Park Service land, place on federall...
-
If you have been charged with OUI which took place on a road owned by the Federal government, National Park Service land, place on federall...
Social Icons
Email Us:
Our Phone #
|
Massachusetts | |
| Cambridge | 888-437-7747 |
| Worcester | 888-437-7747 |
About Mr. Gilmore
Mr. Gilmore earned his law degree at Boston University School of Law, one of the top law schools in the country. He obtained his undergraduate degree at Assumption College with a double major in Political Science and Philosophy. Prior to attending law school, he was a Bodily Injury Claims Adjuster with a large national insurer. Mr. Gilmore’s previous legal experience includes the Cape and Islands District Attorney’s Office and the Committee for Public Counsel Services-Trial Division. More about Gilmore